The Clarification of Contemporary Sects

We continue looking at the connection between al-Ikhwaan al-Muslimoon and the Raafidah Shi'ah of Iran, in particular, al-Khomeini and his revolution. We have pointed out in other articles that the respected reader be wise and insightful and note the connection between the Raafidah and the Khawaarij, in that they were the first two sects to appear in Islaam, both emanating as a result of the activities of the Sab'iyyah against Uthmaan bin Affaan (radiallaahu anhu). Today, that same Rafd and Khaarijiyyah is represented by certain key figureheads whose names go together and they are Hasan al-Banna, Sayyid Qutb, Abu A'laa Mawdudi and Ayatollah Khomeini and Ayatollah Khamenei (see for yourself what we are alluding to in this important article). Between them, these names symbolize exactly what the Sab'iyyah, Rafidah and Khawaarij were upon in the dawn of Islamic history where their aims were to bring down the authorities of Tawhid and Sunnah in that time. Today, we see the same pattern and in fact, the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) has informed us that the Kharijites will never cease to appear until the Dajjaal appears in their midst (see here).

He says later: In yet another twist in Muslim history, the Muslim Brotherhood would in turn requite Afghani's gift to Sunni revivalism by directly stimulating the emergence of a unique form of Shiite Islamism in Iran in the 1950s. Indeed, the Islamic paradigm of pre-revolutionary Iran was profoundly shaped by the ideas of the Muslim Brotherhood as well as by kindred Sunni movements such as the Indo-Pakistani Jamaat-e-Islami and its founder Sayyed Abul Aala Maududi. In this way, Sunni revivalist ideology helped pave the way for the 1979 Iranian revolution that culminated in Shiite Islamism?s greatest achievement: the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

The reason why the Raafidah took a liking to the books of Sayyid Qutb and Abul A'laa Mawdudi is because they contain the poison of the Raafidah, revilement of Uthmaan and Mu'aawiyah (radiallaahu anhum) and in the case of Sayyid Qutb, takfir of Mu'awiyah, his parents and Banu Umayyah (radiallaahu anhum).

A newly released trove of documents recovered from Osama bin Ladens Pakistan compound have revealed secret dealings between Iran and al-Qaeda. A newly released trove of documents recovered from Osama bin Ladens Pakistan compound have revealed "secret dealings" between Iran and al-Qaeda. Nearly half a million files found on the computer seized in the May 2, 2011, US raid on the al-Qaeda founder's hideout in Abbottabad were released by the CIA on Wednesday. A never-before-seen 19-page document purportedly written by a senior member of al-Qaeda details an arrangement between Iran and members of the group to strike American interests in "Saudi Arabia and the Gulf." In exchange, Shia Iran offered Sunni militants "money, arms? and ?training in Hizbollah camps in Lebanon." Iranian intelligence facilitated the travel of some operatives with visas, while sheltering others. Iranian connections to Hizballah and Palestinian militant groups, such as Hamas and Palestinian Islamic jihad, are well-documented, but its ties to al-Qaeda have until now mostly been shrouded in secrecy.

Summarized Translation The determination of the Muslim Brotherhood in strengthening the Islamic revolution in Iran is a determination that is completely harmonious with the emblems of the group and its central (policies) and its pure Islamic thought and also its central (policies) relating to organization (political) activism. It was from the primary aspirations of our Imaam, the Shaheed!![*] Hasan al-Banna (asks for Allaah's mercy upon him), that the Muslims overlook their doctrinal and jurisprudential differences. And he (asks for Allaah's mercy upon him) expended great effort in bringing nearness between the Sunnah and the Shi'ah as an introductory (stepping stone) to abolish all apparent differences between them both. And in this path it he had very strong ties with many of the trusted Shi'ite men such as the Imaam Ayatollah al-Kashani, and the revolutionary, martyr[*] Nawab Safawi and the Imaam Kashif al-Ghitaa in Iraq and others. And the Muslim Brotherhood considers that the establishment of the Islamic revolution in Iran opens the door, renewably, to complete what the Imaam, Shaheed (i.e. Hasan al-Banna) commenced in trying to actualize a foundational change in the ties between the Sunnis and Shi'ites.

It is known through a careful analysis of early Islamic history that the Shiites and Kharijites have common origins. They arose out of the same circumstances. Today, the organisation of the Muslim Brotherhood provides an umbrella under which Shiites and Kharijites can combine in order to wage war against the people of tawhid and Sunnah and to foment revolutions and create sedition in their lands. This includes terrorism and bombing of innocent civilians, both Muslims and non-Muslims. The item below is from a US Court document that was brought to our attention (may Allaah reward the sender) and it provides information that points to collaboration between Hasan al-Turabi (Ikhwani, leader of Sudan), Iran, Hezbollah and al-Qaeda (Bin Laden). In the 1998 embassy bombings in Dar al-Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya, 213 people were killed, both Muslims and non-Muslims. Download the PDF file

HIZBOLLAH is a political Shia group backed by the Rāfiḍi Shia of Iran and is a network that spans across many countries and whose aims are to serve the Shia cause, ideologically and politically. This political party was set up formally in Lebanon in 1985CE although it's initial activities started around 1982CE. This party was set up by the aspirations of the Iranian backed Lebanese Shia. Initially however this movement had the name "Ḥarakah ʾAmal al-Shīʿiyyah" (Movement of Shīʿite Hope), but then it broaded its horizons seeking to gain more popularity and changed the name to "ʾAmal al-Islāmiyyah" (Islamic Hope), this being an offshoot of the main movement. Under this guise of being spokesperson and defender (of Islam), it spread Shīʿ'ism in Lebanon and to other parts of the world. However, there were many crimes and barbarities associated with the original group (Harakah ʿAmal al- Shīʿiyyah) which put the child-group into the position of having to defend itself, and as a tactical move, they simply created a new party and this is what is known today as Hizbollah.

Hizbollah is a political Shia group backed by the Rafidi Shia of Iran and is a network that spans across many countries and whose aims are to serve the Shia cause, ideologically and politically. This cause is to pave the way for their awaited Mahdī through the instigation of strife, turmoil and revolutions in Sunni Muslim lands. They have secret alliances with the enemies, while claiming to serve Islām and the Muslims. September 2011.

Shaykh Rabīʿ bin Hādi said:[1] Since the daʿwah of the Muslim Brotherhood was established, it was mixed and attached with the daʿwah of the Rawāfiḍ (Shiʿah), the grave-worshipping Ṣūfiyyah, the Khawārij. In fact, even with the calls of the Christians. This is the daʿwah of the Muslim Brotherhood ever since it began upon this very foundation, and it never ceases (as such). They are the ones who lead revolutions now in the world. Their beliefs are corrupt. So how can we judge that they are from Ahl al-Sunnah wal-Jamāʿah. If you want to find the ideology of the Khārijites you will find it (with them), and if you wish to find the methodology of the Muʿtazilah, you will find it. If you wish (to find) the methodology of the Rawāfiḍ, you will find it. And if you wish to find Freemasonry, you will find it in their books and in their secret and open agendas.[2]

The Shaykh also stated:[3] Indeed, the Rawāfiḍ (Shīʿah) who are the most enmitous towards the lands of Islām and the Muslims, they are more severe in enmity than the Jews and Christians. I believe resolutely that they have a large role in supporting these revolutionary movements for the destruction of the Muslim lands whilst they remain at a distance and in safety from destructive revolutions themselves. They do not cease supporting these revolutions in the Muslim lands so that one day these (lands) bow down to them.

The meaning of this passage is that even if Ahl al-Sunnah were evil oppressors and sinners and had of innovation and misguidance what is worse than reviling the Companions, then alongside that they would still have the intelligence to look at the better of two goods and the worse of two evils such that they would not aid the people of disbelief (such as the Crusaders or Mongols) against sects of innovation and misguidance, in order to maintain the greater beneficial interest. However, the Rāfiḍah are devoid of this intellect and it is either because they are stupid, or it is because of their rank hatred and severe enmity towards the Sunni Muslims and hating their religion and wanting it to be defeated.

Given this, one should not be deceived by the Rāfiḍah in what appears to be a potential war with Western nations, for that is only on the surface. In real conflict and in ground realities, their interests will converge and they will simply cooperate with each other in targeting and wiping out Sunni strongholds and destabilising their countries and regions. They are the internal enemy (among those who ascribe to Islām), traiterous and treacherous. Arabic Text:

HAMAS IS AN OFFSHOOT of the the Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwān al-Muslimīn) which has Freemasonic origins (through Jamāl al-Dīn al-Irānī). The aims of al-Ikhwān are to supplant Muslim lands with a Ṣūfī-Shīʿite nexus, alongside democracy, as well as unity of religions. From the core doctrines of al-Ikhwān is Taqrīb, which is nearness and closeness with the Rāfiḍah Shīʿah, considering them brethren upon Tawḥīd and Īmān. Ismael Haniyeh is a senior political in Hamas and Khaled Mashal is also a high-ranking political leader. Below are two pictures where both of these Ikhwānis are found at the wathan (idol) of the pagan idolator and enemy of Abū Bakr and ʿUmar (رضي الله عنهما), ‘Ayatollah’ Khomeini. One should note that this connection is not something merely political, wherein shared economic and political interests are pursued, as may happen between nations despite opposite ideologies or religious convictions. Rather, this is an issue of religion and one of deep respect and veneration of the likes of al-Khomeini, a mushrik, kāfir, ṭāghūt, on grounds of religion.[1]